BadUSB Market Comparison
This page compares BYTEBOLT One against the most common BadUSB devices used in penetration testing and security-awareness engagements — the USB Rubber Ducky (Hak5), WHID Cactus, MalDuino, and the Digispark ATtiny85 board — across the criteria that actually matter on a live engagement: USB descriptor spoofing, per-device campaign tracking, CE compliance, killswitch behaviour, custom enclosures, and open-source licensing.
Vendors, specs and prices can change frequently — if you spot an inaccuracy, please get in contact with us.
Comparison table
Section titled “Comparison table”| Device | VID/PID spoof | Tracking | CE | Killswitch | Custom cases | Open source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYTEBOLT One 💰 Best value | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🟢 GPL |
| USB Rubber Ducky™ 💰💰💰 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🟡 | ❌ | 🔴 |
| WHID Cactus 💰💰 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | 🟢 FW: MIT, HW: public |
| MalDuino 💰💰 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | 🟡 FW: MIT, HW: closed |
| Digispark ATtiny85 💰 | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | 🟢 FW: GPL, HW: CC |